Trade: Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik

Market context

Edas Butvilas is due to face Alexander Bublik in the Geneva Open round of 16, with the market currently pricing Butvilas at just 3% and Bublik as the clear favourite. On Polymarket, that implied probability is formed by the live order book, so the price reflects where buyers and sellers are willing to clear today rather than any fixed model estimate. The market is also vulnerable to a late schedule shift because the match is listed for the first week of the tournament and settlement allows for a tie or a delay beyond seven days to resolve 50-50.

The current price sits in line with the broader tennis read: Bublik is the higher-ranked player and the available previews have him around 1.33 to win, with several projecting a straight-sets result. That said, one recent model-based preview from Dimers still put Bublik’s match win probability at 71%, which is strong but not overwhelming for a favourite priced far shorter in the match market. Butvilas is a qualifier and has far less ATP main-draw experience, which helps explain why the crowd has left only a small tail probability on the underdog.

The main catalysts are straightforward: whether the match stays on the published Geneva schedule, whether either player is withdrawn or delayed by weather or court backlog, and whether live reports confirm completion rather than retirement. Tennis Tonic and other preview outlets list the meeting for Wednesday evening local time, while the official Geneva and ATP event pages are the clearest sources for any rescheduling. If the match starts and one player advances after an unfinished contest, that result should settle the market; if it is not played or is pushed beyond the seven-day window, the fallback 50-50 rule applies.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Resolution source

This market settles from the official outcome published at https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current. A proposer submits the final result to the UMA optimistic oracle on Polygon; the two-hour dispute window closes and payouts clear in USDC.

Settlement window & payout timing

For this market, the resolution date is 27 May 2026. A UMA proposer can submit the outcome from that moment; the two-hour dispute window closes at 2026-05-27 10:00 UTC, and assuming no counter-claim is staked, winning USDC clears to trader balances by approximately 2026-05-27 11:00 UTC.

If a dispute is filed inside the two-hour window, the outcome escalates to UMA token-holder voting, which extends settlement by roughly 48 hours. Because this market resolves from a publicly verifiable feed (https://www.atptour.com/en/scores/current), the probability of dispute is materially lower than the overall 0.5% PolyGram baseline — most disputes occur on markets with ambiguous wording or non-public resolution sources.

Withdrawal pace from your PolyGram balance is non-custodial and immediate — once payout clears, funds are yours to send to any Polygon wallet you control. Funds clear directly to your in-app USDC balance on Polygon. Withdrawals are non-custodial: send to any address you control, typical confirmation under 30 seconds, gas paid in USDC if you'd rather not hold MATIC.

Trading mechanics

Minimum order size on PolyGram is $1.00, with no maximum cap aside from available book depth. Orders route into Polymarket's on-chain CLOB on Polygon; the matching engine pairs YES buyers with NO buyers atomically — every executed trade is settled on-chain with no counterparty risk. For "Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik", order-book behaviour for this market reflects the underlying volatility of the outcome — patient limit orders typically fill closer to mid than market orders.

The trade ticket includes a slippage box (default 2%, configurable 0.1%-10%) that caps the worst-case entry price. Your maximum loss is your stake — winning YES (or NO) shares pay $1.00 each at resolution. With this market's current book depth ($498K of resting liquidity), a $500 order should fill with single-cent slippage at the displayed mid-price.

PolyGram charges 0% house edge — no spread mark-up, no rake on winnings, no withdrawal fees beyond network gas. The platform earns exclusively from optional features (copy-trade boosts, advanced order types, the yield vault on idle USDC); the trading surface itself is at-cost.

How to trade this market step by step

The mechanics for trading "Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik" are the same as any other PolyGram event contract. Each YES share resolves to $1 if the event happens, or $0 if it doesn't. The current price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the market's probability estimate, set live by the order book.

1. Sign in on polygram.ink with your email — no full KYC under $1,500 lifetime trading volume.
2. Deposit USDC on Polygon (lowest fees, ~$0.01 per transaction) or Ethereum. Funds credit after 12 confirmations.
3. Pick a side. Buy YES if you believe the event will happen; buy NO if you think it won't. The current YES price reflects the market's collective probability.
4. Size your position. If you stake 100 USDC at 50% YES, you'll receive shares that pay $200 if YES resolves true — a 100% gross return. If NO resolves, your shares are worth $0.
5. Set risk controls (optional). Stop-loss, take-profit, and limit-order types all supported. Use the trade ticket's slippage box to cap your maximum entry price.
6. Wait for resolution. When the event resolves on-chain via the UMA optimistic oracle, the winning side settles to 100¢ automatically and USDC hits your balance within seconds. Withdrawable to any wallet you control.

How active is this market?

$279K in lifetime turnover and $498K of resting liquidity puts this market in the top 10% by volume for tennis contracts on PolyGram. Order-book depth is exceptional — among the deepest order books in the category.

Last 24 hours alone saw $277K in turnover, well above the lifetime daily-average for this market — a clear sign of news catalysing trader activity right now.

The market has been open for under a month — fresh enough that information asymmetry remains a real factor.

Higher-volume markets tend to have tighter spreads and faster price discovery — meaning the displayed YES/NO percentages are more likely to reflect the true crowd-implied probability rather than a single trader's directional view.

Key terms

YES / NO share

A binary outcome token that pays $1.00 if the underlying claim resolves true (YES) or false (NO), and $0 otherwise. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

CLOB

Central limit order book. The matching engine that pairs YES buyers with NO buyers (effectively the same trade). Polymarket's CLOB on Polygon executes trades on-chain via the conditional-tokens framework.

Liquidity

USDC capital sitting in resting limit orders inside the order book. Deeper liquidity means smaller slippage on large trades and a tighter bid-ask spread.

UMA optimistic oracle

The on-chain dispute system that settles each Polymarket market. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution.

Slippage

The difference between the displayed mid-price and your fill price. Affects market orders most; limit orders avoid slippage but may take time to fill.

Conditional token

ERC-1155 outcome share issued by Gnosis Conditional Tokens on Polygon. The token type that resolves to $1.00 or $0.00 at settlement.

This market's resolution criterion

For "Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik", the resolution criterion is: This market refers to the tennis match between Edas Butvilas and Alexander Bublik in the Geneva Open, originally scheduled for May 20, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Edas Butvilas' if Edas Butvilas advances against Alexande…

See the full prediction-market glossary →

Frequently asked questions

Risk and regulatory note

Prediction-market positions can lose 100% of staked capital. Outcomes are uncertain by definition — historical accuracy of crowd-implied probabilities is high in aggregate but not for any single market. PolyGram does not provide investment advice. Trade only with capital you can afford to lose. For "Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik", the considerations above apply directly — Trade size should reflect the binary nature of the payoff: even a 70% probability event resolves NO 30% of the time, so any single position can lose 100% of staked capital.

Regulatory status varies by jurisdiction. Germany, the United States, and most EU countries treat Polymarket-style event contracts under one of three frameworks: financial derivative, gambling product, or unregulated novel asset. Consult local counsel before trading.

Related prediction markets

Explore more prediction market odds and trading opportunities on PolyGram:

• All tennis prediction markets
• How prediction markets work
• Browse all prediction markets on PolyGram
• Top prediction market traders
• Back to PolyGram home